16 May 2007

Once again the negroes get something for nothing


In 2005, JPMorgan Chase issued a letter apologizing to negroes for its participation in slavery issues way back when. It also established a $5 million scholarship fund for negroes in Louisiana.

Now the stockholders at JPMorgan have gotten into the fight - because the then-Chairman & CEO William B. Harrison Jr. and then- President & COO Jamie Dimon used stockholder money! My opinion: if these two felt the need to cough-up $5 million to the negroes, they should have written a personal check, not use stockholder money.

The apology and scholarship was wrong then and is still wrong now. It seems the negroes continue to prove my basic belief about them: they can't seem to get by on their own, always needing the white people giving them something.

Any company/organization that feels the need to apologize/pay extortion money to any group for historical issues is weak. In this instance, I am not aware of any whites currently owning slaves. It happened in the past, get over it.

Why is white America so afraid of negroes? Negroes represent just under 13% of the population. Their annual income per capita is one of the lowest of any other ethnic group in the country. So why do American corporations fear a boycott by negroes? If I were a business, I would be more afraid of losing my white customers (you know, the ones who represent the majority as well as having the money) or even the Asians or Hispanics (both of whom have a higher per capita income).

So, call me racist, bigoted, whatever. That just puts me on equal footing with others like the Rebrobates - oops, Reverends - Jackson, Sharpton, et al.

Opinionated Fool
Semper Fi

06 May 2007

Comrade Hillary Clinton - Ever the Socialist


"BATON ROUGE, La. - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized the Bush administration's response to Hurricane Katrina and pledged Saturday to funnel more federal aid to the still-recovering Gulf Coast if elected." (5 May 2007)

Well, why not!? It isn't like enough money hasn't already been WASTED there.

I have a problem with the government giving help to people who seem determined NOT to help themselves - too deadbeat to get themsleves out of harm's way but strong enough to DEMAND the government "take care of them." (Aimed specifically at New Orleans)

Given the number of people displaced by Katrina and the amount of money already spent there (again, New Orleans), I just hope the government is there to give me more than what I started out with next time I am in a disaster!

But leave it to Comrade Hillary to want to send more of my damned tax dollars to an area predominately populated by deadbeats (and again, I direct this at New Orleans).

Quote from Comrade Hillary: "Many of you are well enough off that...the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

America is already on track - maybe Comrade Hillary is looking down the wrong tracks?

Opinionated Fool
Semper Fi

Nicolas Sarkozy - French conservative - France's new president!


Never thought I would say it - Congratulations and hooray to France!! If Mr Sarkozy does as he indicated, it will be to France's benefit.

I just hope the United States has an electorate smart enough to stop the socialist trend emerging in this country.

Stop socialism - vote against the (Socialist) Democrats.

Opinionated Fool
Semper Fi

Democrats and Gas Prices


Prior to the November 2006 Congressional elections, I remember the Democrats blaming the Republican-controlled Congress for the high gas prices at the pump, suggesting the Republicans controlled gas prices and/or were gouging the public.

Well, the elections are over and it is now May 2007. And the gas prices are not only at the pre-Nov 2006 levels but are projected to hit $4 soon.

My question to the Democratically-controlled Congress: You harped about high prices before the election, now explain to me why YOU, the Democrats, aren't controlling prices at the pump now?

Still haven't received an answer from my Democratic senator. Surprise there!

Opinionated Fool
Semper Fi

07 July 2006

Islamic Apologists


I am really tired of hearing about how "peaceful" the islamic religion is! When the politicians and news media, be it TV, web-based, hard print, etc., talk about islamic terrorists, they inevitably make some tired-assed comments about these killers representing only a very small percentage of islamic muslims and then proceed to explain how peaceful the true islamic religion is! Bullshit...or should I say - Pigshit! (and I consider that as an insult to pigs.)

If this is true, then why don't the "peaceful" islamic muslims speak out against these terrorists? If and when you can find one that does, it sounds half-hearted at best! They are more concerned about how THEY are being treated so poorly by non-islamics than actually condemning these terrorists!

Let's call it like it is: there are islamic terrorists who blow up themselves and innocent people with them; then there are the other islamic 'terrorists' who sit by and do nothing. These islamics, by their very silence or muffled voices, contribute to the view that islam is NOT a religion of peace.

Islam = terrorists. I don't see any other way of viewing it...and I wish the news media and politicians would quit trying to apologize for the islamic religion. We do not need to kiss their camel-riding asses!!

Opinionated Fool
Semper Fi